MAC OS X File Systems Comparison

Like most contemporary day operating method implementations, Mac OS X utilizes an object-oriented vnode layer. xnu’s VFS layer is primarily based on FreeBSD’s, though there are many minor variations (for instance, whilst FreeBSD uses mutexes, xnu utilizes easy locks XNU’s unified buffer cache is integrated with Mach’s virtual memory layer, and so on).
One more essential distinction that should be noted is that all of the above is primarily based on disks mounted below the given operating method. Limitations can be bypassed by serving a disk from a server for which the format is native. For instance, a Windows client that is accessing a served HFS+ disk that is served from a Mac OS X personal computer (a “shared” disk across the network) can write to that disk if the server has granted permission. Likewise, whilst a Mac OS personal computer cannot write to an NTFS volume it mounts itself, it can create to an NTFS volume becoming served by a Windows personal computer.
A single essential query that gets asked regularly at Mac Rumors is: how should I format my external device? Right here are some ideas, based on the above limitations of each file system.
1.    If the device will only be utilized on a Mac OS X laptop, use HFS+. This will provide the most complete support for Mac OS X attributes.
2.    If the device will only be used in Windows, use NTFS, for the exact same rationale.
3.    If the device will be mounted on both Windows and Mac computers, and you will not be utilizing extremely big files (all files <4 GB) use FAT32. Alternatively, if feasible, mount the device on a personal computer on the network which is often turned on, and format it in the native format of that computer. Then use that pc as a server to share that volume with other computer systems. For this purpose, it may possibly be slightly advantageous to make the server a Mac OS X computer, so that the file program complies with POSIX.
4.    If the device is to be mounted on both Windows and OS X computers, and the user has sufficient privileges on all computers with which it will be employed to install the EXT2FS extensions discussed above, then ultimately, EXT2FS may be an exceptional solution. Note even so that, should this drive be taken to other Windows or OS X computers, it will not perform without installation of the extensions.
5.    If you are utilizing an Intel Mac, one particular configuration that is really well-liked is to develop a three partition method. This method consists of boot partitions in HFS+ and NTFS for Mac OS X and Windows, respectively, plus a third partition in FAT32. All documents are then placed on the FAT32 partition, where they are accessible to both operating systems. Whilst this does have limitations, primarily based on the limitations of FAT32, it may be a excellent compromise solution for many users.
6.    Current iPods come formatted by default in a format which can be read by both systems (FAT32) and need to almost certainly be left this way unless specific needs exist with respect to alternate usage (e.g. as a drive for sharing files). Although earlier iPods have been formatted in HFS+ and this technique confers some advantages in Mac-only environments, this is probably not something you need to be concerned about unless you already know what you are undertaking. Likewise, Flash drives need to NOT be reformatted and must be left in FAT32.
File systems cannot very easily be converted from one particular common to one more, so make your choice cautiously. In the occasion that you should later modify systems, you will want to back up all files, reformat the drive (destroying all data on it), and then return the files to the drive. Drives can be formatted with Disk Utility in Mac OS X, and comparable system tools in Windows, even though Windows can’t format a FAT32 partition above 32GB, as Microsoft want you to use NTFS this is an artificial restriction. iPods can be reformatted making use of the iPod Application Updater, accessible from Apple. Backup utilities are also readily accessible on both platforms (backup to numerous DVD-R or DVD-RW discs may be required if only a single external drive is owned).
When Mac OS X writes to a FAT32 drive, it will produce added “dot files” (files beginning with “.” are generally hidden in Unix systems) such as .DS_Retailer. These files enable Mac OS X to compensate somewhat for functions of HFS+ that are not obtainable in FAT32. The end outcome is that most files, like practically all document files, can be transferred back and forth between FAT32 and HFS+ without any genuine concern more than he file system variations.